编号
lyqk009943
中文标题
济南市古树名木资源现状和分布特征
作者单位
1. 济南市园林和林业科学研究院 济南 25010;
2. 2 同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 上海 200092;
3. 华中科技大学建筑与城市规划学院 武汉 430074
期刊名称
中国城市林业
年份
2022
卷号
20
期号
4
栏目名称
研究论文
中文摘要
古树名木的普查、监测、保护一直是研究的重点。文章对2019年济南市古树名木实地普查数据进行统计分析。结果表明:1)济南市共有古树名木20 282株,隶属于33科56属81种,其中,蔷薇科、杨柳科、榆科、豆科、木犀科、松科为典型优势科,栗、柿、侧柏、国槐、白梨、核桃、山楂等为优势种。2)从地理区位看,济南各区(县)均有古树名木分布,与各区(县)土地面积存在显著正相关关系(不考虑济阳区),且具有集中分布于乡村和山地丘陵区的特点;莱芜区、历城区、长清区在数量上表现为前三,其后依次为钢城区、历下区、章丘区。3)从树种形态特征看,树高、冠幅、胸围分别集中在0~10 m、0~10 m、100~150 cm;以古榆树为例,研究发现树龄与胸围、树高与冠幅都呈正相关关系。4)从树龄、生长势和生长环境看,济南市三级古树名木数量多,占比96.10%,生长势正常的古树名木占比91.59%,且多数生长环境良好,占比71.50%。5)从地理区系分布特征看,北温带广布型属占比最高,为35.71%,属分布具有典型的温带性质。基于分析结果,提出保护建议,为济南市古树名木资源保护及开发利用提供理论依据。
基金项目
山东省住房城乡建设科技计划项目(2021-R3-5)
英文标题
Ancient and Famous Trees in Jinan City:Present Situation and Distribution Characteristics
作者英文名
Liu Yu, Li Xining, Liu Hongquan, Yang Xiaojun, Chen Qinglei, Zhang Deshun, Chen Pengxu
单位英文名
1. Jinan Academy of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Jinan 250102, China;
2. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
英文摘要
The investigation,monitoring and protection of ancient and famous trees has been the important field of research.The paper makes a statistical analysis of the field investigation data in 2019.The results show:1) There are 20 282 ancient and famous trees in Jinan,belonging to 81 species in 56 genera of 33 families,among which Rosaceae,Salicaceae,Ulmaceae,Leguminosae,Oleaceae and Pinaceae are the dominant families,while Castanea mollissima,Diospyros kaki,Platycladus orientalis,Styphnolobium japonicum,Pyrus bretschneideri,Juglans regia and Crataegus pinnatifida are the dominant species;2) From the perspective of geographical location,ancient and famous trees are distributed in all districts (counties) of Jinan,which has a significant positive correlation with the land area of the districts and counties (Jiyang District excluded) and present a concentrated distribution in rural,mountainous and hilly areas.Laiwu,Licheng and Changqing districts are the top three in quantity distribution,followed by Gangcheng,Lixia and Zhangqiu districts;3) In terms of the morphological characteristics,the tree height,the crown width and the DBH are mainly in the range of 0-10 m,0-10 m and 100-150 cm,respectively.Taking Ulmus pumila as an example,it is found that tree age is positively correlated with DBH,tree height and crown width;4) In terms of tree age,growth vigor and growth environment,Jinan boasts a large number of three-grade ancient and famous trees,accounting for 96.10%,the ancient and famous trees with normal growth vigor take up 91.59% of the total,and 71.50% of them have a good growth environment;and 5) From the perspective of geographical distribution characteristics,the genus widely distributed in north temperate zone account for 35.71%,which is typical in temperate zone distribution.Based on the above results,suggestions are put forward in order to provide a theoretical basis for the protection and utilization of ancient and famous tree resource.
英文关键词
ancient and famous tree;resource status;distribution characteristics;Jinan City
起始页码
80
截止页码
86
投稿时间
2022-03-29 00:00:00
作者简介
刘毓(1978-),女,硕士,高级工程师,研究方向为园林和林业绿化植物。E-mail:lilyliuyu@126.com
通讯作者介绍
陈芃序(1996-),女,硕士,研究方向为环境设计。E-mail:chen.peng.xu@163.com
E-mail
chen.peng.xu@163.com
DOI
10.12169/zgcsly.2022.03.29.0001
参考文献
[1] 中国林学会,南京林业大学,国家林业局.古树名木普查技术规范.LY/T 2738-2016[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[2] 邢福武.中国的珍稀植物[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2005.
[3] FRITTS H C.Tree rings and climate[M].Caldwell:Blackburn Press,2001.
[4] 田广红,黄东,梁杰明,等.珠海市古树名木资源及其保护策略研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2003,42(增刊2):203-209.
[5] 温小荣,周春国,徐海兵,等.中山陵园古树名木地理信息系统的研建[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):139-142.
[6] 蒋建绒,董建国,朱杰旦,等.慈溪市古树名木资源现状与保护对策[J].浙江林业科技,2012,32(3):58-61.
[7] 焦传兵,臧德奎,任莹,等.崂山古树名木调查、评价及分级保护[J].山东农业科学,2014,46(1):80-85.
[8] 曲凯,李际红,国浩平,等.山东省流苏古树资源及其保护对策[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(5):818-824.
[9] 王大为,程立群,文超.济南千佛山风景名胜区唐槐复壮技术研究山东林业科技[J].2013,43(1):81,68.
[10] 杨煜辰,刘飞,王东,等.古树名木保护管理的供需平衡性研究:以济南市大明湖景区为例[J].山东林业科技,2021,51(5):11-19.
[11] 白红伟,仲丽娜,王晓艺.济南市古树名木保护案例分析[J].山东林业科技,2021,51(4):88-94.
[12] 王利明,马春霞.济南的古树名木[J].城建档案,2007(2):16-19.
[13] 吴征镒,孙航,周浙昆,等.中国种子植物区系地理[J].生物多样性,2011,19(1):148.
[14] 邹嫦,康秀琴,罗开文.广西北海市古树名木资源特征分析[J].林业资源管理,2017(3):128-132.
[15] 范小莉,梁玉,房用,等.山东省古树名木的现状与其保护建议[J].江苏林业科技,2018,45(2):55-57.
[16] 胡坚强,夏有根,梅艳,等.古树名木研究概述[J].福建林业科技,2004,31(3):155-158.
[17] 王洪波,杨铁东.浅谈古树名木生长不良的原因和保护措施[J].华东森林经理,2005,19(2):27-29.
[18] 谈丽萍.古树名木现状及保护管理规划分析[J].现代农业科技,2010(6):212-213.
[19] 洪文君,叶永昌,张浩.香港古树名木资源特征与分布格局[J].广东园林,2021,43(1):56-59.
[20] 王圳,李凤凤,高亚军,等.连云港市古树名木空间分布特征与资源组成[J].中国城市林业,2021,19(5):125-129.
[21] 侯庆武,张庆费,夏檑.上海市古树资源特征研究[J].中国城市林业,2008,6(2):69-71,52.
[22] LAI P Y,JIM C Y,TANG G D,et al.Spatial differentiation of heritage trees in the rapidly-urbanizing city of Shenzhen,China[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2019,181:148-156.
[23] 苏纯兰,严朝东,胡秋艳,等.东莞市古树名木资源特征分析[J].林业与环境科学,2020,36(5):64-72.
PDF全文
浏览全文